Just One More Week
 
Industry Pulse Check Closes June 15. Learn more
 

NAHB Supports Proposed WOTUS Rule, Seeks Key Clarifications

Environment
Published

NAHB submitted comments yesterday to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in response to the Trump administration's proposed definition of "waters of the United States" (WOTUS).

2019 NAHB Chairman Greg Ugalde summarized the views of NAHB, developers and builders by saying NAHB "largely supports the proposal and appreciates the efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to further refine the limits of federal authority and ensure the rule is clear, understandable and workable."

The proposed rule would clarify the extent of federal oversight and correct the vast overreach of prior rules. Once finalized, builders and developers will be better able to determine for themselves whether they will need federal permits for construction activities. And, because the rule narrows the extent of federal jurisdiction by excluding isolated water bodies, "ephemeral" waters that only form in response to rain, and most ditches, builders should require fewer Clean Water Act permits for isolated or temporary wetlands or water bodies.

NAHB's comments included many suggestions on how to clarify the proposed rule and thereby help developers, builders and other landowners to implement the proposed rule’s requirements in the field. For example, NAHB asked the agencies to clarify how landowners should identify excluded ephemeral waters, calculate the amount of rainfall necessary to render a water body jurisdictional, and limit the period of time allowed to determine whether a ditch is man-made or natural. Many state and local associations and NAHB members also provided their own comments on the proposed rule.

In addition, NAHB members provided testimony during several field hearings on the proposal including Feb. 27-28 in Kansas City, and small business roundtable hearings by the U.S. Small Business Administration in Denver on March 27 and Tampa on April 4. Though the proposal marks a milestone in the effort to better define WOTUS, NAHB also asked the agencies to act quickly to rescind the problematic prior 2015 rule.

EPA and the Corps will now review all comments submitted during the comment period, and revise the proposed rule before issuing a final rule.

NAHB will continue to provide input to the agencies during that process and keep members informed of any developments.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics

Jun 11, 2026

Fed Rate Hike Possible Amid Inflation and Geopolitical Uncertainty

The bond market is projecting that it is now more likely than not that the next monetary policy move by the central bank is a federal funds rate increase rather than a cut. NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz provides his insights and recaps key factors shaping the market.

Legal

Jun 11, 2026

Supreme Court Sides Against DOE Appliance Overreach

On June 8, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a D.C. Circuit Court ruling that would have allowed the Department of Energy (DOE) to effectively eliminate certain gas appliances from the market.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jun 11, 2026

Residential Building Material Prices Rise at Highest Rate In Over Three Years

Wholesale prices of goods used in residential construction rose in May as energy prices continued to climb.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Inflation Surpassed 4% in May

Inflation accelerated to a new three-year high in May, driven by continued increases in energy costs from the Iran war. Energy costs drove more than 60% of the monthly increase, with national gasoline prices jumping more than a dollar since the war began.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Home Building Regulatory Cost Burdens Increased 40% from 2021 to 2026

A new NAHB study shows that, on average, regulations imposed by government at all levels account for $131,734, or 26.4%, of the final price of a new single-family home built for sale. Of this amount, $46,795 is due to a higher price for the finished lot, attributable to regulations imposed during the lot’s development.