EPA Releases Plan to Reduce TSCA Fees Burden

Codes and Standards
Published

At NAHB ’s urging, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on March 25 made a significant announcement affecting how our members will be impacted by implementation of the Toxic Substance Control ACT (TSCA) Fees Rule. As NAHBNow reported last week the broad definition of the term “manufacturer” under the rule had the potential to impose a regulatory burden on certain NAHB members.

Currently, manufacturers subject to the requirements of the TSCA Fees Rule would include importers of articles containing a chemical undergoing risk evaluation. This means that retailers, distributors or wholesalers of potentially covered products who import items such as composite wood flooring or cabinets would be required to self-identify under the regulation.

However, after NAHB and other stakeholders reached out to EPA, the agency swiftly responded to address our concerns. EPA announced it intends to propose exemptions to the TSCA Fees rule and the proposed exemptions will cover three categories of manufacturers subject to EPA-initiated Risk Evaluation fees and associated requirements:

1) importers of articles containing one of the twenty high-priority substances;

2) producers of one of the twenty high-priority substances as a byproduct; and

3) producers or importers of one of the twenty high-priority substances as an impurity.

While EPA intends to issue the proposed amendments to the current fees rule later this year, tit does not anticipate finalizing the amendments until 2021. In acknowledgement of the need to bridge the gap between the current self-identification action and finalization of the planned regulatory change, EPA also announced a “No Action Assurance” under its enforcement discretion.

This means that the agency will not pursue enforcement action against entities in the three categories proposed for exemption for failure to self-identify under the TSCA Fee Rule. EPA does not expect entities that fall into one of these three categories take any further action if they were both not identified on a preliminary list and have not yet self-identified.

EPA has published additional information on its website for action related to the TSCA Fees Rule implementation including a FAQ to on both the proposed amendments and No Action Assurance.

For more information on implementation of the TSCA Fees Rule, contact Tamra Spielvogel at 800-368-5242 x8327.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Advocacy

Mar 12, 2026

Statement from NAHB Chairman Bill Owens on Passage of Senate Housing Bill

NAHB Chairman Bill Owens issued the following statement after the Senate passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

Economics

Mar 12, 2026

Single-Family Starts Remain Soft in January on Affordability Concerns

Overall housing starts increased 7.2% in January to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.49 million units, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Mar 12, 2026

Single-Family Starts Remain Soft in January on Affordability Concerns

Elevated construction costs and constrained affordability conditions led to a reduction in single-family housing starts in January.

Economics

Mar 11, 2026

Inflation Steady Before War

After months of downward trend, inflation held steady at an eight-month low in February. This report does not reflect the recent surge in oil prices due to Iran conflict beginning February 28. Higher oil prices will likely translate into higher gasoline costs and impact other sectors associated with transportation including airline tickets.

Economics

Mar 11, 2026

Single-Family Permits End 2025 on a Soft Note

Single-family permitting softened over the course of 2025 and finished the year weaker than the prior year. After showing some resilience in 2024, permitting activity gradually lost momentum as elevated mortgage rates and ongoing affordability constraints weighed on buyer demand.