San Diego Builders Help Defeat Anti-Housing Ballot Measure
A diverse coalition led by the Building Industry Association (BIA) of San Diego County and local REALTORS® defeated a March 3 ballot measure that could have limited housing development in rural areas of San Diego County, Calif.
Measure A, if passed, would have required a countywide vote on any major housing project that involves a change to the county’s general plan. Developers working on any project larger than six homes would need permission from voters, rather than the approval of three county supervisors, if the project is outside the general plan guidelines for urban growth.
The “No on A” coalition, which brought together labor leaders, first responders and politicians on both sides of the aisle, argued the initiative is anti-growth and anti-housing, noting loopholes and exemptions existed for developments like hotels, resorts and casinos. They also said the current system did not need to change and would only add another regulatory layer to new home building in a county already plagued as one of the top five least affordable housing markets in the nation.
BIA of San Diego County President and CEO Borre Winckel said in a No on A statement, “a coalition of unprecedented diversity and strength came together to defeat this bad public policy – and we are just getting started. We are grateful that people of passion and conviction throughout our region raised their voices in support of the cause, recognizing that we need to remove obstacles to housing and ensure that working people and the next generation of San Diegans can afford to live here.”
“Voters understood Measure A would not do what it promised, that it was riddled with loopholes, and that it would force more San Diegans to pay more for homes and apartments in the midst of our housing affordability crisis,” campaign manager Tony Manolatos added.
NAHB supported the defeat of the measure through its State and Local Issues Fund, which provides financial assistance to local HBAs involved in advocacy efforts that could set a precedent for home builders nationwide.
The slim margin of victory, 51.5% to 48.5%, based on March 10 results includes 100% of precincts reporting. However, it does not include all of the more than 1.35 million mail ballots that need only be postmarked by election day. Additionally, provisional ballots – cast for a variety of reasons – can take an unspecified amount of time to be deemed eligible. Still, news outlets and opponents of Measure A declared the measure defeated.
To see more Election 2020 coverage and our efforts to ensuring housing issues are a key part of the conversation throughout the campaign season, visit nahb.org.
Latest from NAHBNow
May 26, 2026
NAHB Publication Offers Remodelers Sneak Peek into Industry FinancialsBuilderBooks, the publishing arm of NAHB, released a new edition of its Remodelers’ Cost of Doing Business Study, 2026 Edition, a national study of remodelers’ business practices and financial performance.
May 22, 2026
Which Home Owners Are Fueling Today’s Remodeling Market?With elevated mortgage rates and limited for-sale inventory making it harder to move, many home owners are instead choosing to invest in the homes they already own. In 2024, an estimated $670 billion was spent on remodeling projects.
Latest Economic News
May 26, 2026
First Quarter 2026 Multifamily Construction DataAccording to NAHB analysis of quarterly Census data, the count of multifamily, for-rent housing starts increased year-over-year during the first quarter of 2026. For the quarter, 107,000 multifamily residences started construction.
May 25, 2026
Custom Home Building – A Bright Spot for ConstructionWith overall single-family construction down 5% for the first four months of 2026, custom home building has been a relative bright spot. The custom building market is less sensitive to the interest rate cycle than other forms of home building but is more sensitive to changes in household wealth and stock prices.
May 25, 2026
Single-Family Built-to-Rent Slowed at Start of 2026Single-family built-for-rent (or built-to-rent, BTR) construction fell back in the first quarter of 2026, as a higher cost of financing, increased multifamily supply and policy concerns over Congressional legislation related to institutional capital froze parts of the development market.