San Diego Builders Help Defeat Anti-Housing Ballot Measure

Codes and Standards
Published

A diverse coalition led by the Building Industry Association (BIA) of San Diego County and local REALTORS® defeated a March 3 ballot measure that could have limited housing development in rural areas of San Diego County, Calif.

Measure A, if passed, would have required a countywide vote on any major housing project that involves a change to the county’s general plan. Developers working on any project larger than six homes would need permission from voters, rather than the approval of three county supervisors, if the project is outside the general plan guidelines for urban growth.

The “No on A” coalition, which brought together labor leaders, first responders and politicians on both sides of the aisle, argued the initiative is anti-growth and anti-housing, noting loopholes and exemptions existed for developments like hotels, resorts and casinos. They also said the current system did not need to change and would only add another regulatory layer to new home building in a county already plagued as one of the top five least affordable housing markets in the nation.

BIA of San Diego County President and CEO Borre Winckel said in a No on A statement, “a coalition of unprecedented diversity and strength came together to defeat this bad public policy – and we are just getting started. We are grateful that people of passion and conviction throughout our region raised their voices in support of the cause, recognizing that we need to remove obstacles to housing and ensure that working people and the next generation of San Diegans can afford to live here.”

“Voters understood Measure A would not do what it promised, that it was riddled with loopholes, and that it would force more San Diegans to pay more for homes and apartments in the midst of our housing affordability crisis,” campaign manager Tony Manolatos added.

NAHB supported the defeat of the measure through its State and Local Issues Fund, which provides financial assistance to local HBAs involved in advocacy efforts that could set a precedent for home builders nationwide.

The slim margin of victory, 51.5% to 48.5%, based on March 10 results includes 100% of precincts reporting. However, it does not include all of the more than 1.35 million mail ballots that need only be postmarked by election day. Additionally, provisional ballots – cast for a variety of reasons – can take an unspecified amount of time to be deemed eligible. Still, news outlets and opponents of Measure A declared the measure defeated.

To see more Election 2020 coverage and our efforts to ensuring housing issues are a key part of the conversation throughout the campaign season, visit nahb.org.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Education

Jul 06, 2026

Estimating Tools to Efficiently Plan and Increase Profitability

With building material prices on the rise, now is a critical time for project managers to refine their estimating strategies to optimize each build.

Advocacy

Jul 02, 2026

U.S. Declines to Renew USMCA Trade Pact

The Trump administration announced yesterday that it will not renew the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jul 06, 2026

Top Ten Builder Market Share Falls in 2025

The top ten builders accounted for 43.6% of all new U.S. single-family home closings in 2025, down 1.2 percentage points from 2024 (44.8%), based on BUILDER magazine data.

Economics

Jul 03, 2026

Mortgage Rates Increased in June as Markets Weigh Inflation and Fed Policy

Mortgage rates continued to increase in June as markets priced in a rate hike due to high inflation and stronger-than-expected labor market.

Economics

Jul 02, 2026

U.S. Economy Adds 57,000 Jobs in June

The U.S. labor market lost momentum in June, with total nonfarm payroll employment rising by just 57,000, the smallest gain since February’s outright decline. Downward revisions to April and May payroll estimates subtracted a combined 74,000 jobs from previously reported totals, reversing the sizable upward revisions reported a month earlier and suggesting underlying hiring momentum was weaker than initially reported.