Court Sides with OSHA, NAHB and Others on Emergency Infectious Disease Standard

Legal
Published

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Thursday rejected a petition by labor unions led by the AFL-CIO to compel OSHA to issue an “emergency temporary standard” to prevent the transmission of infectious diseases, including COVID-19.

The court agreed with OSHA’s position that it was the federal agency that should determine whether a standard was necessary and that OSHA’s decision to issue nonbinding, industry-specific guidance rather than an enforceable rule to protect workers from COVID-19 was sufficient.

OSHA said in a statement: “We are pleased with the decision from the D.C. Circuit, which agreed that OSHA reasonably determined that its existing statutory and regulatory tools are protecting America’s workers and that an emergency temporary standard is not necessary at this time. OSHA will continue to enforce the law and offer guidance to employers and employees to keep America’s workplaces safe.”

NAHB filed an amicus brief supporting OSHA’s position with a coalition of other groups including the Associated Builders and Contractors, the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, the American Subcontractors Association, Leading Builders of America, and the Mason Contractors Association of America.

With public health officials learning new information about COVID-19 and how best to mitigate related hazards on an almost daily and sometimes even hourly basis, the construction industry argued that a static, inflexible rule would not be an appropriate response.

“The D.C. Circuit’s decision correctly recognizes that OSHA is the Agency tasked by Congress to determine whether a rule is needed to protect employees from potential workplace hazards and not the courts,” said Brad Hammock, attorney at Littler Mendelson, P.C. who submitted the brief on behalf of the coalition. “In addition, the opinion reflects the significant efforts already taken by employers – including construction contractors – to address COVID-19 proactively.”

NAHB and its construction safety coalition partners issued job site coronavirus safety guidance in late March and has been constantly adding new resources to keep workers safe from COVID-19 on the job site. The entire construction industry held safety stand downs in April focused on coronavirus safety.

For questions about NAHB litigation, contact Felicia Watson.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Sponsored Content

Nov 26, 2025

6 Practical Ways Builders Can Cut Cycle Time When Every Day Costs Money

Cycle time isn’t just a scheduling issue. It’s a profit issue — one that grows quietly until it owns your entire operation. But there are strategies to help mitigate those challenges to keep your business running smoothly.

Housing Finance

Nov 25, 2025

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Conforming Loan Limits to Rise to $832,750 in 2026

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) today announced that the maximum baseline conforming loan limits for mortgages acquired by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2026 will rise to $832,750, an increase of $26,250 from 2025.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Nov 26, 2025

Property Taxes by State – 2024

Nationally, across the 87 million owner-occupied homes in the U.S., the average amount of annual real estate taxes paid in 2024 was $4,271, according to NAHB analysis of the 2024 American Community Survey.

Economics

Nov 25, 2025

Share of New Homes with Decks Edges Lower

The share of new homes with decks edged down from 17.6% in 2023 to a new all-time low of 17.4% in 2024, according to NAHB tabulation of data from the HUD/Census Bureau Survey of Construction (SOC).

Economics

Nov 25, 2025

Building Material Prices Continued to Rise in September

Aggregate residential building material prices rose at their fastest pace since January 2023 in the latest Producer Price Index release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Input energy prices increased for the first time in over a year, while service price growth remained lower than goods.