Could Rising Materials Prices Leave You Without Enough Insurance Coverage?

Legal
Published

As building material prices continue to rise, home builders and remodelers are reevaluating some of their normal business operations to increase inefficiencies and protect their bottom lines. One area that may not immediately come to mind is the impact of rising prices on a project’s insurance coverage.

During a home construction or renovation project, builders and remodelers carry policies that provide coverage for risks to the project or property. The ever-changing nature of the property covered creates unique valuation issues in the event of a loss.

Coinsurance clauses, which are found in many insurance policies, require the insured to maintain coverage to a specified value of the property, usually between 80% and 100%. It also stipulates that if the insured fails to do so, it must bear a proportionate part of the loss. The term “coinsurance” is also applied to situations where the insured is contractually obliged to insure part of the risk with a second insurer. If the insured fails to carry a sufficient limit to satisfy this provision, a penalty is applied.

Coinsurance provisions also are commonly found in builder’s risk completed-value policies. Because a builder’s risk policy applies to a property that is undergoing construction and therefore its value increases over time, reporting cost overruns that increase the completed value is important to ensure that you do not inadvertently become subject to a coinsurance penalty.

According to Treacy Duerfeldt, CEO of Nationwide Contractors Alliance, and a member of NAHB’s Construction Liability, Risk Management, and Building Materials Committee, this is particularly pertinent now, “because as a result of the rising cost of building materials, it would not be uncommon for the initial estimate of the completed value to be understated, potentially triggering the penalty clause.”

When the actual cost of the project exceeds the initial estimate, it may be necessary to increase the limit or a coinsurance penalty may result.

To ensure that you have the right amount of coverage and to avoid a coinsurance penalty, consult with your insurance advisor or agent.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics

Apr 29, 2026

Home Building Shows Signs of Stabilization with Monthly Gain in Starts

Overall housing starts increased 10.8% in March to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.5 million units, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Housing Affordability

Apr 28, 2026

NAHB Applauds HUD and USDA Action to Roll Back Costly Energy Mandate

NAHB Chairman Bill Owens issued the following statement after the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) announcement today to rescind the rule that would impose the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and ASHRAE 90.1-2019 as the minimum energy-efficiency standards for certain single-family and multifamily housing programs.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Apr 28, 2026

Homeownership Rate Edges Down to 65.3%

The latest homeownership rate declined to 65.3% in the first quarter of 2026, according to the Census’s Housing Vacancy Survey (HVS). While this was a modest quarterly decrease, the broader picture continues to reflect significant affordability challenges.

Economics

Apr 23, 2026

The Silver Tsunami Isn’t Landing Where It’s Needed Most

The “silver tsunami” refers to the wave of housing inventory expected as older homeowners downsize or transition out of their homes. According to the latest American Community Survey, there are an estimated 61.2 million people in the U.S. aged 65 years or older, representing about 18% of the population.

Economics

Apr 22, 2026

State-Level Employment Situation: February 2026

February’s labor market data point to a notable pullback in employment, with job losses concentrated across a majority of states and only modest gains elsewhere. While January showed solid momentum, February’s decline reflects emerging softness in hiring conditions, alongside uneven performance across the country.