Just One More Week
 
Industry Pulse Check Closes June 15. Learn more
 

Proposed Changes to Partnership Tax Rules Would Raise $172 Billion

Tax Reform
Published

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) released the outline of a bill that would significantly alter the tax rules for partnerships. Billed as reducing “partnership tax complexity,” these changes would restrict the ability of partnerships to allocate income and deductions unless those allocations are in line with the partners’ ownership percentages. Sen. Wyden indicated these changes would raise $172 billion in additional tax revenue over the next 10 years and that this proposal will be considered for inclusion as part of the massive tax overhaul plan Democrats are now assembling.

Wyden includes several examples of what his proposal is intended to do, the following which is taken directly from his summary materials and reflects his perspectives:

  • Contributions and distributions of appreciated (or depreciated) property are generally tax free. Partnerships are supposed to allocate built-in gains and losses on contributed property in a way that limits abuse, but they get to choose among three or more allocation methods. Only one —the “remedial method” — actually prevents tax from being shifted between the partners. The discussion draft would require partnerships to use the remedial method, making sure gain and the related tax liability, cannot be shifted.
  • Upon a change in the interests of the partners, a partnership can elect — but is not required — to revalue its assets to prevent the shifting of built-in gain and loss. The discussion draft would require such revaluations.
  • The partnership tax rules afford tremendous flexibility in the allocation of partnership income and losses among partners. The discussion draft would remove optionality and in doing so, simplify administration and curtail abuse. For certain related-party partnerships, the discussion draft would require all income and loss to be allocated pro-rata.

Legislative text is not yet available, but a short summary can be found here and more detailed analysis can be viewed here.

NAHB opposes tax hikes on businesses and will remain actively involved as this tax package moves through Congress.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Advocacy

Jun 10, 2026

Over 1,100 Housing Advocates Call on Congress to Address Affordability

More than 1,100 builders, remodelers and other housing industry professionals went to Capitol Hill today to call for congressional action to improve affordability and help builders to increase the production of affordable, attainable homes.

Codes and Standards

Jun 09, 2026

Connecticut Moves Toward 6-Year Building Code Cycle in Possible Trend

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont has signed into law a bill that lays the groundwork to expand the state’s building code adoption cycle to every six years rather than the current three years.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Inflation Surpassed 4% in May

Inflation accelerated to a new three-year high in May, driven by continued increases in energy costs from the Iran war. Energy costs drove more than 60% of the monthly increase, with national gasoline prices jumping more than a dollar since the war began.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Home Building Regulatory Cost Burdens Increased 40% from 2021 to 2026

A new NAHB study shows that, on average, regulations imposed by government at all levels account for $131,734, or 26.4%, of the final price of a new single-family home built for sale. Of this amount, $46,795 is due to a higher price for the finished lot, attributable to regulations imposed during the lot’s development.

Economics

Jun 09, 2026

Existing Home Sales Increased in May

Existing home sales rose to a five-month high in May as more first-time buyers stepped back into the market. The share of first-time buyer reached 35% in May, the highest since June 2020. However, sales remained weak compared to historical norms, with still-tight inventory continued to push up home prices.