FHFA Clarifies New Fee Structure for Single-Family Home Loans

Housing Finance
Published

In January, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced a new pricing framework for single-family home loans eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) that will lower mortgage fees for some borrowers and raise fees for others. The revised fees are scheduled to take effect on May 1.

Recent press articles are stating that in many cases borrowers with lower credit scores and higher loan-to-values will pay lower fees than borrowers with high credit scores and low loan-to-values.

This is not accurate. The truth is while the fees for some borrowers with high credit scores will increase, those borrowers still will pay less for their mortgage loans than borrowers with lower credit scores.

Lowering fees for low- to moderate-income borrowers and first-time home owners is a positive step to making homeownership more affordable and attainable for many potential creditworthy home buyers who have been locked out of the market. However, NAHB opposes the changes in the new pricing framework that raise fees on borrowers with higher credit quality.

In response to concerns raised by industry stakeholders, FHFA released a statement to clarify its actions.

According to FHFA, “The updated pricing framework will further the safety and soundness of the Enterprises, which will help them better achieve their mission. They will provide reliable liquidity to the market while also providing more targeted support for creditworthy borrowers limited by income or wealth. And they will do so with a pricing framework that is more accurately aligned to the expected financial performance and risks of the loans they back.”

At a time when housing affordability is creating a significant barrier to homeownership, NAHB believes that FHFA should lower fees to help all home buyers. We will encourage FHFA and the Enterprises to reconsider the rollout of these fees and whether there is a better way to accomplish their goals.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics | Workforce Development

Apr 28, 2026

Shrinking Share of Tradesmen in the Construction Workforce

The American construction labor force is continuing its momentum away from construction trades and towards management, business and technical roles, according to NAHB’s analysis of the latest 2024 data from the American Community Survey (ACS).

Material Costs

Apr 28, 2026

U.S. Customs Announces First Phase to Apply for Tariff Refunds

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has launched a new landing page for “International Emergency Economic Powers (IEEPA) Duty Refunds,” rolling out a process for seeking recoupment of IEEPA tariffs. Only importers of record and authorized customs brokers can apply for tariff refunds, and many questions regarding refunds remain unanswered.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Apr 23, 2026

The Silver Tsunami Isn’t Landing Where It’s Needed Most

The “silver tsunami” refers to the wave of housing inventory expected as older homeowners downsize or transition out of their homes. According to the latest American Community Survey, there are an estimated 61.2 million people in the U.S. aged 65 years or older, representing about 18% of the population.

Economics

Apr 22, 2026

State-Level Employment Situation: February 2026

February’s labor market data point to a notable pullback in employment, with job losses concentrated across a majority of states and only modest gains elsewhere. While January showed solid momentum, February’s decline reflects emerging softness in hiring conditions, alongside uneven performance across the country.

Economics

Apr 21, 2026

Population Growth and Housing Supply Dynamics at the County Level in 2025

U.S. population growth slowed notably in the latest Vintage 2025 population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau, with the nation expanding by just 0.5% in 2025, roughly half the pace of the prior year. The deceleration was primarily driven by a sharp decline in net international migration (NIM), which dropped from 2.7 million to 1.3 million, while natural change remained relatively stable.