NAHB Urges Supreme Court to Revive Nondelegation Doctrine
NAHB continues its involvement with Allstates Refractory Contractors, LLC, v. Su, et al. — a case challenging the Occupational Safety and Health Act’s delegation of lawmaking power to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) as unconstitutional — as it heads to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Constitution vests in Congress all the legislative powers of the United States. A principle known as the nondelegation doctrine provides that Congress may not delegate its legislative authority to another branch of government. However, over time, the courts have eroded the nondelegation doctrine by allowing Congress to delegate authority to an executive agency if it provides an “intelligible principle” for an agency to follow.
As relevant to Allstates, Congress tasked OSHA with enacting any permanent occupational safety standard it deems appropriate, an extremely broad mandate. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Congress properly delegated authority to OSHA under the intelligible principle test and noted that federal courts almost never invalidated congressional delegation of legislative authority. Consequently, Allstates Refractory Contractors filed a petition for the Supreme Court to hear the case and issue a ruling that would revive the nondelegation doctrine.
Allstates addresses whether Congress may outsource the creation of workplace safety standards to OSHA. The type of mandate at issue here grants OSHA complete discretion to establish safety standards without any direction from Congress about how OSHA should identify safety issues or what to consider when creating safety standards. Congress has failed to create any identifiable policy and instead unconstitutionally delegated that responsibility entirely to OSHA.
NAHB filed an amicus brief urging the Court to hear this case, as the nondelegation doctrine is at risk of falling by the wayside to make room for the ever-growing executive branch. NAHB also filed an amicus brief when this case was before the Sixth Circuit.
The nondelegation doctrine is meant to preserve the separation of powers principle. The framers of the Constitution wanted to avoid any one part of government possessing too much unchecked power. Consequently, they dispersed power among three branches that could each, in theory, keep the other branches in check. The nondelegation doctrine enforces that structure by preventing the shift of power from one branch to another.
The legislative branch is the most accountable to the people, which is why it has the power to write laws and set policies. Individual members of Congress are elected by, and may be removed from office by, voters. In contrast, agency officials are not elected and cannot be removed from office by the people they ultimately govern, which disconnects power from the very people most affected by it. Here, Congress, not OSHA, has the power to determine what workplace safety standards should be.
Unfortunately, Congress routinely tasks agencies with crafting policies and regulations, often only providing vague instructions. This has been permitted by the courts, and only a contrary opinion from the Supreme Court instructing the courts to follow a more rigorous policy can correct that habit.
OSHA’s response to the petition for a writ of certiorari is due April 1, 2024, after which the Supreme Court will decide whether to hear the case.
Latest from NAHBNow
Sep 17, 2025
Housing Starts Remain Soft Ahead of Fed MeetingOverall housing starts decreased 8.5% in August to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.31 million units, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau.
Sep 16, 2025
Tradeswomen Paving Their Own WayNAHB spoke with Professional Women in Building (PWB) members Elyse Adams and Brittney Quinn about their career paths in the trades and how PWB has positively influenced their journeys.
Latest Economic News
Sep 17, 2025
The Fed Cuts and Projects More Easing to ComeAfter a monetary policy pause that began at the start of 2025, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy committee (FOMC) voted to reduce the short-term federal funds rate by 25 basis points at the conclusion of its September meeting. This move decreased the target federal funds rate to an upper rate of 4.25%.
Sep 17, 2025
Housing Starts Remain Soft Ahead of Fed MeetingChallenging affordability conditions continue to act as headwinds for the housing industry, but the sector could see lower interest rates in the near future with the Federal Reserve expected to cut short-term interest rates this afternoon.
Sep 16, 2025
Builder Confidence Steady but Future Sales Expectations Hit Six-Month HighBuilder sentiment levels remained unchanged in September but lower mortgage rates and expectations that the Federal Reserve will soon cut the federal funds rate led to higher future sale expectations in the coming months.