Biden Administration Releases Decarbonization Plan for Homes and Buildings
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently released an ambitious blueprint for decarbonizing buildings in the country, including homes. The stated goal of the plan is to reduce carbon emissions from buildings 90% by 2050 compared with the 2005 baseline, with an interim goal of a 65% reduction by 2035.
Although the blueprint was created in consultation with other federal agencies and includes many state, local and federal policy ideas, it is a non-binding document that does not make specific regulatory or policy proposals.
NAHB is supportive of finding ways to reduce carbon emissions and increase energy efficiency in homes. But the plan laid out by the administration relies heavily on building code changes and a shift to electrification in homes, which would decrease choice for home buyers and owners and increase construction costs for new homes.
The plan does note that existing buildings and homes, especially in disadvantaged communities, are a major source of carbon emissions and most buildings that exist today will still exist in 2050, necessitating an extensive retrofit effort. The document, however, does not offer any new funding solutions for what it notes is the main driver of heating and cooling loads in buildings: The envelope in residential buildings and ventilation in commercial buildings.
In discussing retrofitting or remodeling, DOE noted that it may need to develop contractor standards to “increase the likelihood of quality work performance,” and offered its Energy Skilled certification as an example.
NAHB has consistently argued that the only way to meaningfully reduce carbon emissions from homes is to address existing homes. And many of the required updates will be expensive and should be voluntary for owners.
DOE’s blueprint leans heavily on required changes through standards, codes and regulatory actions. For example, when discussing what actions can be taken at the federal level to “lock in cost-effective performance gains,” the options given are:
- Appliance efficiency standards
- Support building energy code development and adoption
- Support other state/local regulatory actions
As climate risks become more widespread, governments will need to take bold action. But huge leaps in standards, rules, codes and other regulations will disrupt a housing market that is already in an affordability crisis. We must remind policymakers that homes aren’t just units of carbon production; they are where people live, and everyone needs one.
Latest from NAHBNow
Jun 24, 2026
HUD Announces 14 Regulatory Changes to Help Lower Housing CostsThe U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced 14 policy changes to its Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Single Family mortgage insurance program aimed at lowering costs, easing regulatory burdens, and improving affordability for Americans using FHA-insured mortgages.
Jun 24, 2026
NAHB Statement on President Trump Canceling Signing of Housing BillNAHB Chairman Bill Owens issued the following statement after President Trump canceled his plan to sign landmark housing legislation today.
Latest Economic News
Jun 24, 2026
Sawmill Output Slips as Capacity Continues to DeclineU.S. sawmill production fell in the first quarter, the second consecutive quarter of lower output according to the Federal Reserve G.17 Industrial Production report. Sawmill output has remained largely flat since 2023, after increasing in the post-pandemic period.
Jun 23, 2026
State-Level Employment Situation: May 2026State labor market conditions remained mixed in May, with payrolls expanding in many states while job losses were concentrated in a smaller group of states and the District of Columbia (D.C.). Construction employment also continued to grow nationwide, although performance varied considerably across states.
Jun 22, 2026
Structural Demand Outpacing Supply: Jobs-to-Permits Ratios Highlight Housing GapStrong labor market growth continued to put pressure on the nation’s housing supply in 2024, as home building activity did not fully keep pace with demand driven by job gains. Comparing net new jobs with prior-year permitting activity helps show whether the pace of housing construction is keeping up with potential household formation and broader economic growth.