Biden Administration Releases Decarbonization Plan for Homes and Buildings
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently released an ambitious blueprint for decarbonizing buildings in the country, including homes. The stated goal of the plan is to reduce carbon emissions from buildings 90% by 2050 compared with the 2005 baseline, with an interim goal of a 65% reduction by 2035.
Although the blueprint was created in consultation with other federal agencies and includes many state, local and federal policy ideas, it is a non-binding document that does not make specific regulatory or policy proposals.
NAHB is supportive of finding ways to reduce carbon emissions and increase energy efficiency in homes. But the plan laid out by the administration relies heavily on building code changes and a shift to electrification in homes, which would decrease choice for home buyers and owners and increase construction costs for new homes.
The plan does note that existing buildings and homes, especially in disadvantaged communities, are a major source of carbon emissions and most buildings that exist today will still exist in 2050, necessitating an extensive retrofit effort. The document, however, does not offer any new funding solutions for what it notes is the main driver of heating and cooling loads in buildings: The envelope in residential buildings and ventilation in commercial buildings.
In discussing retrofitting or remodeling, DOE noted that it may need to develop contractor standards to “increase the likelihood of quality work performance,” and offered its Energy Skilled certification as an example.
NAHB has consistently argued that the only way to meaningfully reduce carbon emissions from homes is to address existing homes. And many of the required updates will be expensive and should be voluntary for owners.
DOE’s blueprint leans heavily on required changes through standards, codes and regulatory actions. For example, when discussing what actions can be taken at the federal level to “lock in cost-effective performance gains,” the options given are:
- Appliance efficiency standards
- Support building energy code development and adoption
- Support other state/local regulatory actions
As climate risks become more widespread, governments will need to take bold action. But huge leaps in standards, rules, codes and other regulations will disrupt a housing market that is already in an affordability crisis. We must remind policymakers that homes aren’t just units of carbon production; they are where people live, and everyone needs one.
Latest from NAHBNow
May 22, 2026
Which Home Owners Are Fueling Today’s Remodeling Market?With elevated mortgage rates and limited for-sale inventory making it harder to move, many home owners are instead choosing to invest in the homes they already own. In 2024, an estimated $670 billion was spent on remodeling projects.
May 22, 2026
Local Leaders and Builders Unite to Tackle Workforce Gaps in HousingNAHB’s state and local team earlier this year helped convene mayors, city leaders, planners and builders in Orlando as part of the America’s Housing Comeback discussion series to examine workforce development challenges.
Latest Economic News
May 26, 2026
First Quarter 2026 Multifamily Construction DataAccording to NAHB analysis of quarterly Census data, the count of multifamily, for-rent housing starts increased year-over-year during the first quarter of 2026. For the quarter, 107,000 multifamily residences started construction.
May 25, 2026
Custom Home Building – A Bright Spot for ConstructionWith overall single-family construction down 5% for the first four months of 2026, custom home building has been a relative bright spot. The custom building market is less sensitive to the interest rate cycle than other forms of home building but is more sensitive to changes in household wealth and stock prices.
May 25, 2026
Single-Family Built-to-Rent Slowed at Start of 2026Single-family built-for-rent (or built-to-rent, BTR) construction fell back in the first quarter of 2026, as a higher cost of financing, increased multifamily supply and policy concerns over Congressional legislation related to institutional capital froze parts of the development market.