What Buyers Expect to Pay vs. Actual Home Prices
There is a major gap between buyers’ expectations and home prices, according to recent surveys from NAHB and the U.S. Census Bureau.
While 38% of buyers expect to pay less than $250,000 for their next home, only 5% of homes that started construction in 2023 are actually priced under $250,000.
In contrast, the share of new homes being built that sell for above $250,000 is often far greater than the share of buyers seeking homes in that price range.
The chart below illustrates this contrast.
For new homes priced below $250,000, the red bars are longer than the blue bars, indicating that the share of prospective and recent buyers exceeds the share of new homes being built in those price ranges. Above $250,000, the opposite is true. The blue bars are longer than the red bars, indicating that the share of homes being built exceeds the share of buyers in the market at those prices.
While existing homes in the starter market have traditionally consisted of the bulk of sales for buyers with modest incomes, the supply of homes in the resale market have been running at historically low levels for several years and prices of existing homes have been setting record highs. Indeed, the median price of an existing home in May was well over $400,000. A major part of the reason for this limited existing inventory is due to the interest rate “lock-in effect,” where home owners are reluctant to sell their home because their current mortgage rate is well below market rates.
Another large part of the explanation for the actual versus expected price mismatch is the cost of new home construction. Residential construction wages continue to rise. Although prices of many residential building materials have been stable recently, the stability comes after massive increases in the two years following the onset of the COVID pandemic. A shortage of lots has been a chronic issue since the home building industry started to recover from the Great Recession.
Moreover, regulatory costs can be substantial. NAHB’s latest study on the topic shows regulation accounting for $93,870 of the cost of an average new single-family home. The largest regulatory cost impact, $24,414, comes from changes to building codes over the past 10 years. This is followed by $12,184 in fees paid by the builder after purchasing the lot, $11,791 in regulatory costs incurred by the developer during site work, $10,854 in the value of land that must be purchased and dedicated to the government or otherwise left unbuilt, and $10,794 in required architectural details that exceed what the builder would ordinarily do.
NAHB Senior Economist Paul Emrath provides more analysis in this Eye on Housing blog post.
Latest from NAHBNow
Aug 04, 2026
How AI Is Changing the Way Builders Source and Validate LandAI can strengthen site selection in two key ways: surfacing parcels competitors would otherwise never see, and validating them fast enough to act.
Aug 03, 2026
Strengthen Your Safety Plan During OSHA's Safe + Sound WeekJoin NAHB and OSHA in celebrating this year’s Safe + Sound Week, Aug. 10-16, to recognize the successes of workplace health and safety programs and share information and ideas on how to keep workers safe.
Latest Economic News
Aug 04, 2026
Construction Job Openings RisingThe number of open positions in the construction sector increased in June, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). The current level of open jobs is down measurably from three years ago due to declines in construction activity, particularly in housing.
Aug 03, 2026
Residential Construction Spending Slips as Remodeling Activity WeakensPrivate residential construction spending declined 0.3% in June, while substantial downward revisions to improvement (remodeling) spending significantly altered the sector’s recent trajectory.
Jul 31, 2026
Housing’s Share of GDP Moves Lower in the Second QuarterHousing’s share of the economy was 15.8% in the second quarter of 2026, according to the latest estimates of GDP produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This share is down from 15.9% in the first quarter and is at the lowest level since 2019.